A presentation of some concepts that could be useful when building [digital] infrastructures in hostile environments (state, police, fascists, cis-men, TERFs, SWERFs, etc.) where it can be difficult to build trust remotely, asking ourselves how can we bridge the gap between documentation and configuration, bridge the gap between “users” and “admins” ?<\/p>\n
Current digital infrastructures are usually managed by a series of mysterious incantations made by Language: English<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A presentation of some concepts that could be useful when building [digital] infrastructures in hostile environments (state, police, fascists, cis-men, TERFs, SWERFs, etc.) where it can be difficult to build trust remotely, asking ourselves how can we bridge the gap between documentation and configuration, bridge the gap between “users” and “admins” ? Current digital infrastructures … <\/p>\ncis-men<\/s>persons with full-privileges<\/strong>. Can we depart from that and find a way to build them collectively, and make them transparent, reproducible, autonomous?<\/p>\n